Immanuel Kant

An erudite scholar and a learned man belonging to the 18^th century is Immanuel Kant. He originally came from the Prussian city of Konigsberg. The prominent fact of his teaching life and his belief in certain ideologies, where the last of the long list of philosophies which inspired modern day Europe. In the lines of John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, Kant joins in spreading knowledge during the enlightenment period with the theory of knowledge. When philosophical thoughts were suppressed and opposed, he created a new perspective in his which continues to influence the study of philosophy even now.

Immanuel Kant mainly worked on epistemology which was his fore subjects besides covering those including history, law and religion. Critique of Pure Reason was the most ideal work in his writing. It was an in-depth study and analysis into limitations which also questioned the structure of reason itself. Kent personally contributed his ideas contradicting the beliefs on metaphysics and epistemology with traditional beliefs. In another work, Critique of Practical Reason he ventured into the world of ethics while aesthetics and teleology was explored in Critique of Judgment.

The path taken by his studies and work varied drastically from those of traditional practices. They idealized various beliefs while applied science to reveal how combinations could change the basic fundamentals set by the previous scholars. It paved way for modern erudition especially when he displayed how epistemology could change or reform metaphysics. One of the principles he stuck onto was an object whether being felt or not always possessed the same mass with certain properties. The conclusion was that what mind can presume or imagine must be confirmed with the manner of thought by physically experiencing it.

The scholar and philosopher Immanuel Kant believed he could create a mutual compromise between empiricists and rationalists. It was one of the difficult tasks he took up as empiricists are people who believed in practical experience to understand or gain knowledge while rationalists where on the other end believing that reasoning could help gain the same knowledge which is open to Cartesian doubt. The philosopher Kant brings both of their ideas to a point with a question on reasoning alone without experience will wrongly convex thoughts towards illusion while experience without prior theoretical idea is simply not enough. He was influential person in Germany and his ideas created modern European beliefs as he balanced analytics and philosophy together.

Questions:

• What was Immanuel Kant’s chief argument?
• How did Kant idealize rationalists and empiricists?