Trade Liberation:

Economists in particular have debated the advantages and disadvantages of trade liberalization for centuries. Classical economists such as David Ricardo and Adam Smith were strongly in favor of free trade, believing that it led to the economic prosperity of civilizations. They pointed to examples of civilizations that had flourished as a result of increased trade liberalization, such as Egypt, Greece, and the Roman Empire, as well as the more modern example of the Netherlands. Because of the economic impact that trade has always had on civilizations, governments often become involved in trade with the goal of producing a particular economic outcome for their countries. Trade liberalization refers to the removal of government incentives and restrictions from trade between nations. It is a subject of much scholarly and political debate, given the impact that trade has on the livelihood of so many people, especially in developed countries. Modern economists who favor trade liberalization cite evidence that it creates jobs, fosters economic growth, and improves the standard of living because of increased consumer choice in the marketplace. Those who argue against rapid trade liberalization also cite statistical evidence that free trade can harm the ecology of the marketplace and have negative effects on poor countries. For example, the World Bank estimates that the number of people in the world living on less than $2 U.S. Dollars (USD) per day has risen by almost 50% since 1980. This correlates precisely with the period of the most worldwide trade liberalization in recent history. The implication of many of the arguments against trade liberalization is that trade negotiations should focus first on fairness to developing countries, rather than further opening up the markets of the poorest countries to competition. It is also argued that developing countries would gain more from trade liberalization as a percentage of their GDP than industrial countries, because their economies are more highly protected and because they face higher barriers.